Retired MLB star Jose Canseco lost a finger (again) throughout a poker tournament last week.
Jose Canseco was the central figure in a weekend for the poker world which was filled with fingers: some lost, some pointed at prominent names in the poker community. In Canseco’s case, he seems to have lost the finger that is same the 2nd time in of a month, something that few individuals (with any luck) will ever get to experience.
In late October, Canseco had been in the news for unintentionally shooting himself in the hand. Based on Canseco, the incident happened while he was cleaning his weapon in his kitchen. He ended up shooting their hand, which then had to be surgically reattached. It appears some surgeons are more skilled than other people at digital fixes, though.
Finger Comes Off During Poker Tournament
In accordance with a tweet sent out by Canseco on Friday, nevertheless, the finger became detached once more while he had been playing in a poker tournament Thursday evening.
‘ I became playing in a poker tournament final night and my little finger fell of,’ Canseco tweeted. ‘Someone took a video from it.’
Thankfully, Canseco didn’t post that video, though there is at least one expected image of his finger before it dropped off. As gruesome while the incident may sound, however, Canseco said that this result may have been unavoidable from the time he shot himself.
‘My little finger should have been amputated right from the start,’ Canseco tweeted. ‘It was very loose with no bone in order to connect it. It ended up being additionally smelling really bad.’
There had been no word on whether or not Canseco won the hand to make up for losing the finger. Previously, Canseco’s fingers were best-known for gripping bats during his 17-year major league profession as a professional baseball player, during which he hit 462 home runs.
Colman Gives Hellmuth the Verbal Finger
Meanwhile, One Drop winner Daniel Colman was pointing a finger, still firmly connected, of their own at 13-time World Series of Poker bracelet champion Phil Hellmuth. Colman made some comments that are harsh Hellmuth in a thread about the latter’s current appearance on a podcast hosted by Rounders journalist Brian Koppelman.
‘Its embarrassing that individuals need to share our profession with whores like this guy,’ Colman wrote. ‘After we win one drop, he immediately comes on stage to shake my turn in front of a camera and congratulate me. Just as if he’s the gatekeeper to the poker world and welcoming me in.
‘It is truly pathetic that the 40 year old would behave the way he does at the table, as well as just how spineless he is, just willing to take any sponsorship whatever the organization’s integrity,’ the $22 million winner waxed on. ‘ Really makes me sad to think there’s a chance some social people may look as much as this charlatan. Folks of his attitude and character are really a cancer to this globe.’
Hellmuth was evidently amazed and hurt by the reviews, and responded shortly to them on Twitter.
‘Ouch, I was simply assaulted time that is big a terrific poker forum,’ Hellmuth tweeted. ‘It was personal plus it hurts, but I am proud for the man I am!’
For their part, Colman later admitted that his choice of language was a touch too harsh, and made a decision to back off the tone of his post, also if he stood behind the message.
‘we admit to being too harsh in my initial post. Phil didn’t deserve that hateful of a message,’ Colman later wrote. ‘That being said, we still stand by the main gist of my post. Phil’s behavior in poker is atrocious, and I do not think it belongs in this game.’
NBA Commissioner Adam Silver Pushing for Legal US Sports Betting
NBA Commissioner Adam Silver claims that US legal recreations wagering is regulated in the us. (Image: USATSI)
Can legal US sports betting, across the board, ever be a thing? a proponent that is surprising emerged in the form of NBA Commissioner Adam Silver.
Commissioner Silver penned an op-ed for The New York Times recently, stating that he thinks it is time to allow sports betting to legally take place through the United States. That stance is in opposition to that on most major sports organizations in the united states, including the previously held position by the NBA and its commissioner that is former Stern.
‘Betting on professional sports happens to be illegal in most of the United States outside of Nevada,’ Silver said at the start of his opinion piece. ‘I think we need an alternate approach.’
Currently Illegal in many States
Silver went on to describe the current state of sports gambling in the USA.
In 1992, Congress passed the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA) slotsforfun-ca.com, a piece of legislation that prohibited states from regulating sports betting, while grandfathering in four states that already had some kind of the betting available. Nevada could be the state that is only full recreations betting, while Delaware, Montana and Oregon also have the proper to offer more limited forms of sports-based gambling.
The NBA, along with other sports leagues and organizations in the US, has previously stood in opposition to legalizing sports betting for decades as silver states. But which includesn’t stopped people from gambling on the games, no matter what the lack of the legal, regulated option.
‘But despite appropriate restrictions, sports wagering is widespread,’ Silver wrote. ‘It is a thriving underground business that operates free from regulation or oversight. Because there are few legal options available, those who wish to bet resort to bookmaking that is illicit and shady offshore websites.’
Based on Silver, some estimates place the volume of illegal sports betting in the united states of america at the maximum amount of as $400 billion per 12 months. That dwarfs the total amount of appropriate sports betting that takes place in Las Vegas casinos and other locations in Nevada.
Trends Aim Towards Regulation
Into the piece, Silver writes about the ‘domestic and worldwide trends’ towards regulation of sports betting. He highlights that many states now offer at least some kind of legal gambling, and that online gambling has already been regulated in three states. As a result, he says, it’s the perfect time for Congress to enact laws that are new replace PASPA.
‘Congress should adopt a federal framework that allows states to authorize betting on professional sports, subject to strict regulatory requirements and technical safeguards,’ he wrote.
Silver has previously made comments suggesting he would be thinking about seeing regulated sports betting in the usa, though this is the first-time he has organized his position in full. Other sports leagues declined to touch upon Silver’s stance.
Cuban Backs Silver’s Stance
Nevertheless, one or more NBA owner has already sided with the commissioner. Outspoken Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban told CBSsports.com that ‘Adam has it exactly right.’
‘In the past for PR reasons, we have set up token resistance to them,’ Cuban said. ‘I trust Adam that now is the time to take sports betting out of the shadows and deal it is. with it like the huge business’
Despite Silver’s reviews, however, New Jersey should not expect the NBA to pull out of a lawsuit that is aiming to stop the continuing state from allowing sports betting to carry on at its gambling enterprises and racetracks.
‘Without a comprehensive solution that is federal state measures such as New Jersey’s recent initiative are both unlawful and bad general public policy,’ Silver had written.
Ron Paul Rails Against Adelson Internet Poker Ban Plan
Ron Paul laid out their arguments against an online gambling ban that is highly supported by casino magnate Sheldon Adelson. (Image: David J. Phillip /AP)
Ron Paul has used their weekly column for the Ron Paul Institute to argue against an Internet gambling ban, saying that such legislation would curtail the freedom of Us americans and could be taken up just for the advantage of casino owner Sheldon Adelson.
The previous Republican Representative from Texas called legislation that is such example of ‘cronyism,’ something he says that many Americans are against no matter their political ideologies.
‘For instance, Congress may soon vote on legislation outlawing Internet gambling,’ Paul published.
‘It is an open secret, at least inside the Beltway, that this legislation is being thought to be an opt to billionaire casino owner, Sheldon Adelson. Mr. Adelson, who is perhaps most commonly known for using their enormous wealth to advance a pro-war foreign policy, is now making use of his political impact to turn their online competitors into crooks.’
Gambling Ban Introduced to Congress in March
Paul’s words refer to the Restoration of America’s Wire Act (RAWA), a bill that ended up being introduced by Republicans both in homely homes of Congress in March, and it has since picked up small but notable levels of bipartisan support in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. The bill would outlaw most forms of on the web gambling at the federal degree, essentially changing the wording of the Wire Act to explicitly ban casino games and poker rather than just activities betting, because it is interpreted.
Paul spent much of his column dissecting and rejecting the reasons that are various for supporting the ban in an attempt to show it was really only being considered with regard to Adelson.
‘Supporters of an Internet gambling ban publicly deny they are inspired by way of a desire to curry benefit with a rich donor,’ Paul wrote. ‘ Instead, they give a true number of high-minded reasons for wanting to ban this activity. Some claim that legalizing online gambling will even enrich criminals and terrorists! But criminalizing online casinos will not eliminate the need for online gambling enterprises. Alternatively, passage of this legislation will guarantee that the likely online gambling market is controlled by crooks.’
Paul Criticizes States’ Rights Argument
One of the( that is major to many, perplexing) arguments employed by supporters of RAWA is that such a ban would really protect states’ rights. Paul explained their argument before laying out their thinking for why it was faulty.
‘Their argument is the fact that citizens of states that ban Internet gambling may easily get those laws around by accessing online casinos operating in states where online gambling is legalized,’ Paul reported. ‘ Regardless if the argument had merit that permitting states to legalize online gambling undermines laws in other states, it would not justify federal legislation on the issue…arguing that ‘states rights’ justifies creating new federal crimes turns the Tenth Amendment, which ended up being intended to limit federal power, on its mind.’
Paul laid out several more arguments against the legislation before summarizing their opposition to an online gambling ban.
‘The proposed ban on Internet gambling is a blatantly unconstitutional infringement on our liberties that may likely expand the surveillance state,’ he concluded. ‘Worst of all, it is all being done for the main benefit of one effective billionaire.’
RAWA is unlikely to receive a hearing or see much movement in Congress through the current duck session that is lame. However, its prospects could improve into the next Congress, when Republicans will have majorities both in your house and Senate.